1LUEGO vino la suerte de la mitad de la tribu de Manasés, por ser él el primogénito de José. Respecto a Maquir primogénito de Manasés, padre de Galaad, por cuanto era varón de guerra, ya había obtenido a Galaad y el Basán. 2Era pues esta suerte para los hijos restantes de Manasés, por sus parentelas: para los hijos de Abiezer, y para los hijos de Helec, y para los hijos de Asriel, y para los hijos de Siquem, y para los hijos de Hefer, y para los hijos de Semida: éstos fueron los hijos varones de la casa de Manasés hijo de José, por sus parentelas. 3Mas Zelofehad hijo de Hefer, hijo de Galaad, hijo de Maquir, hijo de Manasés, no tuvo hijos sino hijas; y estos son los nombres de sus hijas: Mahla, Noa, Hogla, Milca, y Tirsa. 4Éstas pues se presentaron delante de Eleazar el sumo sacerdote, y delante de Josué hijo de Nun, y delante de los príncipes, diciendo: Jehová mandó a Moisés que se nos diese herencia en medio de nuestros hermanos. Josué pues les dió por mandato de Jehová, herencia entre los hermanos de su padre. 5Por manera que cayeron a Manasés diez porciones, además de las tierras de Galaad y de Basán, que están de la otra parte del Jordán; 6porque aquellas hijas de Manasés obtuvieron herencia entre sus hijos; y la tierra de Galaad quedó para los demás hijos de Manasés. 7Y el término de Manasés alcanzaba desde Aser a Micmetat, que está frente a Siquem; y seguía la línea por el lado derecho hasta los habitantes de En-tapúa. 8De Manasés era la región de Tapúa, mas Tapúa misma, situada en el territorio de Manasés, era de los hijos de Efraim. 9Luego bajaba la línea al torrente de Caná, al lado meridional del torrente: estas ciudades fueron de Efraim, aunque estaban en medio de las ciudades de Manasés. Y el territorio de Manasés caía al norte del torrente; y llegaban sus extremos al Mar Grande. 10Por el lado del sur, era de Efraim, y por el lado del norte, de Manasés. El mar también era su término; y tocaban estas dos tribus con Aser por el norte, y con Isacar por el este. 11Además Manasés tenía en Isacar y en Aser, a Bet-sean con sus aldeas, y a Ibleam con sus aldeas, y a los habitantes de Dor con sus aldeas, y a los habitantes de En-dor con sus aldeas, y a los habitantes de Taanac con sus aldeas, y a los habitantes de Meguido con sus aldeas; tres regiones altas. 12Mas los hijos de Manasés no pudieron desposeer a los habitantes de aquellas ciudades: sino que convino el Cananeo en habitar con ellos en aquella tierra. 13Pero sucedió que cuando ganaron fuerza los hijos de Israel, pusieron a los Cananeos bajo tributo servil; mas no los desposeyeron totalmente. 14¶Los hijos de José hablaron entonces a Josué, diciendo: ¿Por qué me has dado a mí por herencia una sola suerte y una sola porción, siendo así que soy un pueblo grande, por cuanto hasta aquí me ha bendecido Jehová? 15Mas Josué les contestó: Si eres un pueblo grande, sube al país del bosque, y haz desmontes para ti allá en la tierra de los Perezeos y de los Refaítas, ya que es estrecha para ti la serranía de Efraim. 16Pero los hijos de José le respondieron: No basta para nosotros la serranía, y todos los Cananeos que habitan en las tierras de los valles tienen carros de hierro; tanto los de Bet-sean y sus aldeas, como los que están en el Valle de Jezreel. 17Entonces habló Josué a la casa de José, a Efraim y a Manasés, diciendo: Pueblo grande eres y tienes gran poder. No has de tener una sola suerte; 18porque la serranía será tuya. Aunque es bosque, tú la desmontarás, y tuya será en toda su extensión; porque desposeerás al Cananeo, aunque tenga carros de hierro y aunque sea fuerte.
Matthew Henry - Complete Commentary 1 Manasseh was itself but one half of the tribe of Joseph, and yet was divided and subdivided. 1. It was divided into two parts, one already settled on the other side Jordan, consisting of those who were the posterity of Machir,
Josh 17:1. This Machir was born to Manasseh in Egypt; there he had signalized himself as a man of war, probably in the contests between the Ephraimites and the men of Gath,
1Chr 7:21. His warlike disposition descended to his posterity, and therefore Moses gave them Gileaxdand Bashan, on the other side Jordan, of which before,
Josh 13:31. It is here said that the lot came to Manasseh,
for he was the first-born of Joseph. Bishop Patrick thinks it should be translated,
though he was the first-born of Joseph, and then the meaning is plain, that the second lot was for Manasseh, because, though he was the first-born, yet Jacob had preferred Ephraim before him. See the names of those heads of the families that settled on the other side Jordan,
1Chr 5:24. 2. That part on this side Jordan as subdivided into ten families,
Josh 17:5. There were six sons of Gilead here named (
Josh 17:2), the same that are recorded
Num 26:30-
Num 26:32, only that he who is there called
Jezeer is here called
Abiezer. Five of these sons had each of them their portion; the sixth, which was Hepher, had his male line cut off in his son Zelophehad, who left daughters only, five in number, of whom we have often read, and these five had each of them a portion; though perhaps, they claiming under Hepher, all their five portions were but equal to one of the portions of the five sons. Or if Hepher had other sons besides Zelophehad, in whom the name of his family was kept up, their posterity married to the daughters of Zelophehad the elder brother, and in their right had these portions assigned them. See
Num 36:12. Here is, (1.) The claim which the daughters of Zelophehad made, grounded upon the command God gave to Moses concerning them,
Josh 17:4. They had themselves, when they were young, pleaded their own cause before Moses, and obtained the grant of an inheritance with their brethren, and now they would not lose the benefit of that grant for want of speaking to Joshua, but seasonably put in their demand themselves, as it should seem, and not their husbands for them. (2.) The assignment of their portions according to their claim. Joshua knew very well what God had ordered in their case, and did not object that they having not served in the wars of Canaan there was no reason why they should share in the possessions of Canaan, but readily
gave them as inheritance among the brethren of their father. And now they reaped the benefit of their own pious zeal and prudent forecast in this matter. Thus those who take care in the wilderness of this world to make sure to themselves a place in the inheritance of the saints in light will certainly have the comfort of it in the other world, while those that neglect it now will lose it for ever.
7 We have here a short account of the lot of this half tribe. It reached from Jordan on the east to the great sea on the west; on the south it lay all along contiguous to Ephraim, but on the north it abutted upon Asher and Issachar. Asher lay north-west, and Issachar north-east, which seems to be the meaning of that (
Josh 17:10), that they (that is, Manasseh and Ephraim, as related to it, both together making the tribe of Joseph) met in Asher on the north and Issachar on the east, for Ephraim itself reached not those tribes. Some things are particularly observed concerning this lot: - 1. That there was great communication between this tribe and that of Ephraim. The city of Tappuah belonged to Ephraim, but the country adjoining to Manasseh (
Josh 17:8); there were likewise many cities of Ephraim that lay within the border of Manasseh (
Josh 17:9), of which before,
Josh 16:9. 2. That Manasseh likewise had cities with their appurtenances in the tribes of Issachar and Asher (
Josh 17:11), God so ordering it, that though every tribe had its peculiar inheritance, which might not be alienated from it, yet they should thus intermix one with another, to keep up mutual acquaintance and correspondence among the tribes, and to give occasion for the doing of good offices one to another, as became those who, though of different tribes, were all one Israel, and were bound to love as brethren. 3. That they suffered the Canaanites to live among them, contrary to the command of God, serving their own ends by conniving at them, for they made them tributaries,
Josh 17:12,
Josh 17:13. The Ephraimites had done the same (
Josh 16:10), and from them perhaps the Manassites learned it, and with their example excused themselves in it. The most remarkable person of this half tribe in after-time was Gideon, whose great actions were done within this lot. He was of the family of Abiezer; Cesarea was in this lot, and Antipatris, famed in the latter ages of the Jewish state.
14 Here, I. The children of Joseph quarrel with their lot; if they had had any just cause to quarrel with it, we have reason to think Joshua would have relieved them, by adding to it, or altering it, which it does not appear he did. It is probable, because Joshua was himself of the tribe of Ephraim, they promised themselves that they should have some particular favour shown them, and should not be confined to the decision of the lot so closely as the other tribes; but Joshua makes them know that in the discharge of his office, as a public person, he had no more regard to his own tribe than to any other, but would administer impartially, without favour or affection, wherein he has left an excellent example to all in public trusts. It was a very competent provision that was made for them, as much, for aught that appears, as they were able to manage, and yet they call it in disdain but
one lot, as if that which was assigned to them both was scarcely sufficient for one. The word for
complainers (
Jude 1:16) is
mempsimoiroi , blamers of their lot: - 1. That they were very numerous, through the blessing of God upon them (
Josh 17:14):
I am a great people, for the Lord has blessed me; and we have reason to hope that he that hath sent mouths will send meat.
I am a great people, and in so small a lot shall not have
room to thrive. Yet observe, when they speak thankfully of their present increase, they do not speak confidently of the continuance of it. The Lord has blessed me hitherto, however he may see fit to deal with me for the future. The uncertainty of what may be must not make us unthankful for what has been and is done in kindness to us. 2. That a good part of that country which had now fallen to their lot was in the hands of the Canaanites, and that they were formidable enemies, who brought into the field of battle
chariots of iron (
Josh 17:16), that is, chariots with long scythes fastened to the sides of them, or the axle-tree, which made great destruction of all that came in their way, mowing them down like corn. They urge that though they had a good portion assigned them, yet it was in bad hands, and they could not come to the possession of it, wishing to have their lot in those countries that were more thoroughly reduced than this was.
II. Joshua endeavours to reconcile them to their lot. He owns they were a
great people, and being two tribes ought to have more than
one lot only (
Josh 17:17), but tells them that what had fallen to their share would be a sufficient lot for them both, if they would but work and fight. They desired a lot in which they might indulge themselves in ease and luxury. No, says Joshua, you must not count upon that;
in the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread is a sentence in force even in Canaan itself. He retorts their own argument, that they were a
great people. If so, you are the better able to help yourselves, and have the less reason to expect help from others. If thou hast many mouths to be filled, thou hast twice as many hands to be employed; earn, and then eat. 1. He bids them work for more (
Josh 17:15):
Get thee up to the wood-country, which is within thy own border, and let all hands be set to work to cut down the trees, rid the rough lands, and make them, with art and industry, good arable ground. Note, Many wish for larger possessions who do not cultivate and make the best of what they have, think they should have more talents given them who do not trade with those with which they are entrusted. Most people's poverty is the effect of their idleness; would they dig, they need not beg. 2. He bids them fight for more (
Josh 17:17,
Josh 17:18), when they pleaded that they could not come at the wood-lands he spoke of because in the valley between them and it were Canaanites whom they durst not enter the lists with. Never fear them, said Joshua, thou hast God on thy side, and
thou shalt drive out the Canaanites, if thou wilt set about it in good earnest,
though they have iron chariots. We straiten ourselves by apprehending the difficulties in the way of our enlargement to be greater than really they are. What can be insuperable to faith and holy resolution?