1Khi người nào làm chứng bị bắt thề rồi, và phạm tội vì không tỏ ra điều mình đã thấy hay là đã biết, thì người đó sẽ mang tội mình. 2Khi ai sẽ đụng đến một vật ô uế, hoặc thây của con thú nhà không tinh sạch, hoặc thây của con thú rừng không tinh sạch, hoặc thây của loài côn trùng nào không tinh sạch, mà không tự biết, thì sẽ bị ô uế và mắc tội. 3Khi ai, hoặc tự biết hay không biết, sẽ đụng đến sự ô uế nào của loài người, không cứ bị ô uế cách nào, thì cũng sẽ mắc tội. 4Khi ai nói sơ ý thề thốt làm ác hay là làm thiện, mặc dầu cách nào, trước không ngờ đến, rồi sau lại tự biết, thì ai đó sẽ mắc tội trong điều nầy hay là điều kia. 5Vậy, khi nào ai mắc tội về một trong các điều nầy, thì phải xưng mình phạm tội chi, 6rồi vì tội mình đã phạm, dẫn đến Ðức Giê-hô-va một con cái trong bầy súc vật nhỏ, hoặc chiên cái hay là dê cái, đặng làm của lễ chuộc tội; thì thầy tế lễ sẽ làm lễ chuộc tội cho người. 7Nếu không phương thế lo cho có một chiên cái hay là một dê cái được, thì phải vì tội mình đã phạm, đem đến cho Ðức Giê-hô-va một cặp cu hay là cặp bồ câu con: một con dùng làm của lễ chuộc tội, một con dùng làm của lễ thiêu. 8Người sẽ đem cặp đó đến cho thầy tế lễ; thầy tế lễ sẽ dâng trước con dùng làm của lễ chuộc tội, vặn rứt đầu gần nơi gáy cổ không gãy lìa ra; 9đoạn rảy huyết của con sinh tế chuộc tội trên một phía của bàn thờ; huyết còn dư lại thì vắt dưới chân bàn thờ; ấy là một của lễ chuộc tội. 10Còn chim kia, người phải tùy theo lệ đã định, dùng làm một của lễ thiêu. Ấy vậy, thầy tế lễ sẽ vì người đó làm lễ chuộc tội người đã phạm, thì tội người sẽ được tha. 11Nếu không phương thế lo cho có một cặp cu hay là cặp bồ câu con được, thì người vì tội mình đã phạm, phải đem một phần mười ê-pha bột lọc làm của lễ chuộc tội, không nên đổ dầu trên và cũng không nên thêm nhũ hương, vì là một của lễ chuộc tội. 12Người sẽ đem bột đó đến thầy tế lễ; thầy tế lễ sẽ bốc một nắm làm kỷ niệm. và xông trên bàn thờ như cách xông của lễ dùng lửa dâng cho Ðức Giê-hô-va: ấy là một của lễ chuộc tội. 13Ấy vậy, thầy tế lễ sẽ vì người đó làm lễ chuộc tội người đã phạm về một trong mấy điều nầy, thì tội người sẽ được tha; bột còn dư lại sẽ thuộc về thầy tế lễ như trong cuộc của lễ chay vậy. 14Ðức Giê-hô-va lại phán cùng Môi-se rằng: 15Khi nào ai ở bất trung, lầm lỡ phạm đến vật thánh của Ðức Giê-hô-va, thì ai đó vì sự mắc lỗi mình, phải dẫn đến Ðức Giê-hô-va một con chiên đực không tì vít chi bắt ở trong bầy, đánh giá bằng siếc-lơ bạc, tùy theo siếc-lơ của đền thánh: ấy sẽ là một của lễ chuộc sự mắc lỗi. 16Người đó phải bồi thường và phụ thêm một phần năm giá trị của vật mình đã phạm đến nơi đền thánh, rồi giao vật đó cho thầy tế lễ. Thầy tế lễ sẽ dùng chiên con đực về của lễ chuộc sự mắc lỗi mà làm lễ chuộc tội cho người ấy, và tội người sẽ được tha. 17Khi nào ai phạm một trong các điều răn của Ðức Giê-hô-va mà không tự biết, và làm điều không nên làm, thì ai dó sẽ mắc lỗi và mang lấy tội mình. 18Người vì sự lỗi mình phải dẫn đến thầy tế lễ một con chiên đực, không tì vít chi bắt trong bầy, tùy theo ý ngươi đánh giá; rồi thầy tế lễ sẽ làm lễ chuộc lỗi cho người đã lầm lỡ phạm tội và không tự biết, thì lỗi người sẽ được tha. 19Ấy là của lễ chuộc sự mắc lỗi: người hẳn phải mắc lỗi cùng Ðức Giê-hô-va vậy.
Matthew Henry - Complete Commentary 1 I. The offences here supposed are, 1. A man's concealing the truth when he was sworn as a witness to speak the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Judges among the Jews had power to adjure not only the witnesses, as with us, but the person suspected (contrary to a rule of our law, that no man is bound to accuse himself), as appears by the high priest adjuring our Saviour, who thereupon answered, though before he stood silent,
Matt 26:63,
Matt 26:64. Now (
Lev 5:1),
If a soul sin (that is, a person, for the soul is the man), if he
hear the voice of swearing (that is, if he be adjured to testify what he knows, by an
oath of the Lord upon him,
1Kgs 8:31), if in such a case, for fear of offending one that either has been his friend or may be his enemy, he refuses to give evidence, or gives it but in part,
he shall bear his iniquity. And that is a heavy burden, which, if some course be not taken to get it removed, will sink a man to the lowest hell. He that
heareth cursing (that is, that is thus adjured) and betrayeth it not (that is, stifles his evidence, and does not utter it), he is a partner with the sinner, and
hateth his own soul; see
Prov 29:24. Let all that are called out at any time to bear testimony think of this law, and be free and open in their evidence, and take heed of prevaricating. An oath of the Lord is a sacred thing, and not to be dallied with. 2. A man's touching any thing that was ceremonially unclean,
Lev 5:2,
Lev 5:3. If a man, polluted by such touch, came into the sanctuary inconsiderately, or if he neglected to wash himself according to the law, then he was to look upon himself as under guilt, and must bring his offering. Though his touching the unclean thing contracted only a ceremonial defilement, yet his neglect to wash himself according to the law was such an instance either of carelessness or contempt as contracted a moral guilt. If at first it be
hidden from him, yet when he knows it he
shall be guilty. Note, As soon as ever God by his Spirit convinces our consciences of any sin or duty we must immediately set in with the conviction, and prosecute it, as those that are not ashamed to own our former mistake. 3. Rash swearing. If a man binds himself by an oath that he will do or not do such a thing, and the performance of his oath afterwards proves either unlawful or impracticable, by which he is discharged from the obligation, yet he must bring an offering to atone for his fully in swearing so rashly, as David that he would kill Nabal. And then it was that he must
say before the angel that it
was an error, Qoh 5:6.
He shall be guilty in one of these (
Lev 5:4), guilty if he do not perform his oath, and yet, if the matter of it were evil, guilty if he do. Such wretched dilemmas as these do some men bring themselves into by their own rashness and folly; go which way they will their consciences are wounded, sin stares them in the face, so sadly are they
snared in the words of their mouth. A more sad dilemma this is than that of the lepers, If we sit still, we die; if we stir, we die. Wisdom and watchfulness beforehand would prevent these straits.
II. Now in these cases, 1. The offender must confess his sin and bring his offering (
Lev 5:5,
Lev 5:6); and the offering was not accepted unless it was accompanied with a penitential confession and a humble prayer for pardon. Observe, The confession must be particular,
that he hath sinned in that thing; such was David's confession (
Pss 51:4),
I have done this evil; and Achan's (
Josh 7:20),
Thus and thus have I done. Deceit lies in generals; many will own in general they have sinned, for that all must own, so that it is not any particular reproach to them; but that they have sinned
in this thing they stand too much upon their honour to acknowledge: but the way to be well assured of pardon, and to be well armed against sin for the future, is to be particular in our penitent confessions. 2. The priest must
make atonement for him. As the atonement was not accepted without his repentance, so his repentance would not justify him without the atonement. Thus, in our reconciliation to God, Christ's part and ours are both needful.
7 Provision is here made for the poor of God's people, and the pacifying of their consciences under the sense of guilt. Those that were not able to bring a lamb might bring for a sin-offering a pair of
turtle-doves or
two young pigeons; nay, if any were so extremely poor that they were not able to procure these so often as they would have occasion, they might bring a pottle of fine flour, and this should be accepted. Thus the expense of the sin-offering was brought lower than that of any other offering, to teach us that no man's poverty shall ever be a bar in the way of his pardon. The poorest of all may have atonement made for them, if it be not their own fault. Thus the poor are evangelized; and no man shall say that he had not wherewithal to bear the charges of a journey to heaven. Now,
I. If the sinner brought two doves, one was to be offered for a sin-offering and the other for a burnt-offering,
Lev 5:7. Observe, 1. Before he offered the burnt-offering, which was for the honour and praise of God, he must offer the sin-offering, to make atonement. We must first see to it that our peace be made with God, and then we may expect that our services for his glory will be accepted. The sin-offering must make way for the burnt-offering. 2. After the sin-offering, which made atonement, came the burnt-offering, as an acknowledgment of the great mercy of God in appointing and accepting the atonement.
II. If he brought fine flour, a handful of it was to be offered, but without either oil or frankincense (
Lev 5:11), not only because this would make it too costly for the poor, for whose comfort this sacrifice was appointed, but because it was a sin-offering, and therefore, to show the loathsomeness of the sin for which it was offered, it must not be made grateful either to the taste by oil or to the smell by frankincense. The unsavouriness of the offering was to intimate that the sinner must never relish his sin again as he had done. God by these sacrifices did speak, 1. Comfort to those that had offended, that they might not despair, nor pine away in their iniquity; but, peace being thus made for them with God, they might have peace in him. 2. Caution likewise not to offend any more, remembering what an expensive troublesome thing it was to make atonement.
14 Hitherto in this chapter orders were given concerning those sacrifices that were both sin-offerings and trespass-offerings, for they go by both names,
Lev 5:6. Here we have the law concerning those that were properly and peculiarly
trespass-offerings, which were offered to atone for trespasses done against a neighbour, those sins we commonly call trespasses. Now injuries done to another may be either in holy things or in common things; of the former we have the law in these verses; of the latter in the beginning of the next chapter. If a man
did harm (as it is
Lev 5:16)
in the holy things of the Lord, he thereby committed a trespass against the priests, the Lord's ministers, who were entrusted with the care of these holy things, and had the benefit of them. Now if a man did alienate or convert to his own use any thing that was dedicated to God, unwittingly, he was to bring this sacrifice; as suppose he had ignorantly made use of the tithes, or first-fruits, or first-born of his cattle, or (which, it should seem by
Lev 22:14-
Lev 22:16, is principally meant here) had eaten any of those parts of the sacrifices which were appropriated to the priests; this was a trespass. It is supposed to be done through mistake, or forgetfulness, for want either of care or zeal; for if it was done presumptuously, and in contempt of the law, the offender died without mercy,
Hebre 10:28. But in case of negligence and ignorance this sacrifice was appointed; and Moses is told, 1. What must be done in case the trespass appeared to be certain. The trespasser must bring an offering to the Lord, which, in all those that were purely trespass-offerings, must be a
ram without blemish, of the second year, say the Jewish doctors. He must likewise make restitution to the priest, according to a just estimation of the thing which he had so alienated, adding a fifth part to it, that he might learn to take more heed next time of embezzling what was sacred to God, finding to his cost that there was nothing got by it, and that he paid dearly for his oversights. 2. What must be done in case it were doubtful whether he had trespassed or no; he had cause to suspect it, but he
wist it not (
Lev 5:17), that is, he was not very certain; in this case, because it is good to be sure, he must bring his trespass-offering, and the value of that which he feared he had embezzled, only he was not to add the fifth part to it. Now this was designed to show the very great evil there is in sacrilege. Achan, that was guilty of it presumptuously, died for it; so did Ananias and Sapphira. But this goes further to show the evil of it, that if a man had, through mere ignorance, and unwittingly, alienated the holy things, nay, if he did but suspect that he had done so, he must be at the expense, not only of a full restitution with interest, but of an offering, with the trouble of bringing it, and must take shame to himself, by making confession of it; so bad a thing is it to invade God's property, and so cautious should we be to abstain from all appearances of this evil. We are also taught here to be jealous over ourselves with a godly jealousy, to ask pardon for the sin, and make satisfaction for the wrong, which we do but suspect ourselves guilty of. In doubtful cases we should take and keep the safer side.